On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:58:42 -0700 Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ole > May I suggest that we consider starting a working group on this: > > iRtf, perhaps, but not iEtf, yet. It's still in the research phase. > > Both robustness and distance sensitivity need to be assessed, before it will > be appropriate for the standards process. > > In addition, the LGS requirement would seem to have pretty onerous long-term > administrative overhead... > Also, if you read the article, there is a very serious patent encumbrance, and it is doubtful if it would get by the new IPR policy. Regards Marshall Eubanks > > d/ > --- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > +1.408.246.8253 > dcrocker a t ... > WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf