I wasn't advocating for more ADs, but for more 'virtual' ADs, i.e., to
move the work of reviewing out of the ADs, and let the ADs distrbute the
reviews and collect and interpret the results.
I would agree on one point. Document reviewers seem to me would help. Most of the initial feedback (at least for my '1' case) was editorial and not technical. The technical feedback came later.
I can imagine that virtual ADs might be very useful for reviewing early WG drafts (long before the WG thinks it is done), identifying potentially contentious issues and needed cross-area review, giving feedback to the authoring WGs about those, and informing the real ADs about the state of the document.
Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf