Odonoghue, Karen F wrote: - We did not deploy anything new or experimental. We deployed what we had available. In the case of the wireless, the alternative was about a dozen Cisco 350s the secretariat had stashed away in case of emergency. FWIW: Those 350s were provided after a similar bad experience specifically so there would be consistent and stable equipment available. The fact that they are considered 'emergency' at this point shows that in fact people do expect new features from the equipment, overly a fairly short period of time. Any discussion about acquiring new equipment needs to consider the replacement costs to keep it up with expectations. Given the state of evolution for 802.11 equipment this means annual refresh until things settle down. I do appreciate the effort of the volunteer team. I was a mostly happy user of the A channels, with the only issue being that I had to tunnel IPv6. Tony _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf