Keith Moore wrote:
IMHO, charters should not be bound to specific documents. It's one thing to say "WG X will produce a document describing protocol Y", quite another to say "WG X shall publish draft-ietf-x-joe's-specification-for-y". It's up to the WG, not the ADs, to decide which specification to submit to IESG to meet a particular charter requirement. And WGs should be able to change their minds about such things.
I agree with this. In fact I think it should take rough consensus to keep a draft from becoming a WG draft. Alternatives are good!
Eliot
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf