> What is particularly ironic is that these I-Ds began as individual > submissions and we were asked to bring them in, under Marid, just in time > for the working group to be disbanded. We have seen that situation before, for example when the NGTRANS working group was disbanded. Some of the work was picked up by a new working group, but to start with a clean base all drafts had to be resubmitted as individual contribution. At this point, we get the deadline effect: a work that in reality is a revision has now to meet the "original submission" deadline. That's not very fair. In these conditions, there should be some kind of automatic exemption, maybe by allowing drafts to use an N+1 version number. -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
