Re: IDN security violation? Please comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bruce Lilly wrote:

> Unicode code size increased overnight by more than 4 orders
> of magnitude (a factor of 65536) when it went from 16 bits
> 65536 code points) to 32 bits (over 4 billion code points)

AFAIK it's only a factor 17 up to u+10FFFF, and the relevant
standards like STD 63 eplicitly restrict themselves to this
UTF-16 compatible range incl. many "private use" code points,
surrogates, (yet) unassigned code points, non-characters, etc.

> Unicode *everywhere* isn't likely to happen

Your points are valid even without this "31 bits horror trip".

                      Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]