Re: IPR language in IASA BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On rescanning (and rescanning) the text, I find that "irrevocable" is
> already in there (!), but I have some problems with where to fit
> "fully paid up", since it is really only relevant to licensing, while
> most of the text talks about "rights".
>
> There is one paragraph that does talk about licensing, in paragraph 7
> of section 3.1, and we can add it there:
>
>         It is preferred that Developed Software be
>         provided and licensed for IASA and IETF use in source
>         code form, with no ongoing payments.
>
> No binding promises, but our preference is clear.
> Makes sense?
That makese sense.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]