--On 11. februar 2005 11:52 -0500 Leslie Daigle <leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To try to minimize the change from the original edits, may I suggest this:
Should the IETF standards process at some future date come to include other technical activities, the IAOC is responsible for developing plans to provide administrative support for them.
Is that better?
That probably makes more sense. BTW, ISOC and the IASA are logical places to look for such. But in this context IASA is the hands and feet and IAOC is the brain. So putting the responsibility with the IAOC is probably rational.
FWIW, I like this proposal. I don't believe the intention was ever to create blank cheques, but the IASA as a whole is meant to be driven by the IETF's needs, and we shouldn't lose sight of that even as we give the IAOC the necessary tools to push back on things it can't do. I think this strikes the reasonable balance.
Added to edit buffer.
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf