Additional supported activities (Re: ASCII diff of ISOC-proposed changes to BCP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On 11. februar 2005 11:52 -0500 Leslie Daigle <leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To try to minimize the change from the original edits, may I suggest
this:

     Should the IETF standards process at some future date come to
     include other technical activities, the IAOC is responsible for
     developing plans to provide administrative support for them.

Is that better?


That probably makes more sense. BTW, ISOC and the IASA are logical
places to look for such. But in this context IASA is the hands and feet
and IAOC is the brain. So putting the responsibility with the IAOC is
probably rational.

FWIW, I like this proposal. I don't believe the intention was ever to create blank cheques, but the IASA as a whole is meant to be driven by the IETF's needs, and we shouldn't lose sight of that even as we give the IAOC the necessary tools to push back on things it can't do. I think this strikes the reasonable balance.

Added to edit buffer.




_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]