Re: IDN security violation? Please comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "JFC" == JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    JFC> Dear James, A Registry can certainly take care of SLD, not of
    JFC> lower levels. IMHO the problem is no more with IDNs (no one
    JFC> want to change RFC 3490!), but to avoid to propagate the
    JFC> problem into the IRI. 

Handling this problem at the IRI level is inappropriate.  I don't
think that the domain slot in the IRI is any different than other
internationalized domain slots.  

I think we implicitly decided that this problem did not need a
protocol-level fix when we failed to require such a fix either for
IDNs or for all internationalized domain slots.

I think that there was sufficient discussion of the issue that people
were aware of the implications of this decision.

--Sam


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]