Re: some pending IASA issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "JFC" == JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    JFC> 2. ISOC is an international organization, yet there is no
    JFC> indication about relations with ISOC local chapters. For
    JFC> organizing local IETF lists, assisting with IETF meetings,
    JFC> documenting specific local issues when requested, encouraging
    JFC> regional workshops, meetings, shows, publications. This
    JFC> should be noted in a short paragraph to acknowledge
    JFC> national/regional contributions and support and to leave open
    JFC> any further suggestion/development. Cost: 3lines to be added.

I agree it is appropriate for ISOC to discuss local chapters.

How do you see this impacting the IASA BCP?  Can you give an example
of what sort of change you are talking about?  Proposed text and an
indication of where it should go in the document would be best.



    JFC> 3. Regional representation. Most of the Internet
    JFC> organizations make sure their BoD is regionally
    JFC> distributed. This is not appropriate for a technical entity,
    JFC> however IAOC is an administrative body. I would suggest the
    JFC> Draft Section 4 to include a recommendation (not an
    JFC> obligation) that all the main parts of the world are
    JFC> represented at the IAOC. Cost: 2 lines to be added.

I agree that regional location is an important factor to consider when
selecting IAOC members.

--Sam


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]