Re: Mud. Clear as. Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Leslie,

This formulation is still of the form that does not give the IETF community a direct voice in the review and appeal mechanisms for the IAOC.

I, personally see not reason why the IAOC is not directly addressable by the community and does not have a direct obligation to the IETF community. While I am comfortable with the IESG and IAB being the appeal path for the IAOC, I am not comfortable with them being a firewall for the IAOC.

I think this is a fundamental question that differentiates Margaret's formulation from yours. I also think it is a fundamental question that goes back to issues in the problem statement about the current leadership model: too much influence is focused in one leadership group. One benefit of the creation of the IAOC is that it spreads the task of running of the IETF to another group of people. As such, I think the IAOC must be required to respond directly to the community.

a.

On 25 jan 2005, at 21.15, Leslie Daigle wrote:

--------

3.5  Business Decisions

Decisions made by the IAD in the course of carrying out IASA business
activities are subject to review by the IAOC.

The decisions of the IAOC must be publicly documented for each formal
action.

3.6  Responsiveness of IASA to the IETF


The IAOC is directly accountable to the IETF community for the performance of the IASA. In order to achieve this, the IAOC and IAD will ensure that guidelines are developed for regular operation decision making. Where appropriate, these guidelines should be developed with public input. In all cases, they must be made public.

Additionally, the IASA should ensure there are reported objective
performance metrics for all IETF process supporting activities.

In the case where someone questions that an action of the IAD or the
IAOC has been undertaken in accordance with this document
or those operational guidelines (including the creation of an
appropriate set of such guidelines), he or she may ask for a formal
review of the action.

The request for review is addressed to the person or body that took
the action. It is up to that body to decide to make a response,
and on the form of a response.

The IAD is required to respond to requests for a review from the
IAOC, and the IAOC is required to respond to requests for a review
of a decision from the IAB or from the IESG.

If members of the community feel that they are unjustly denied a
response to a request for review, they may ask the IAB or the IESG
to make the request on their behalf.

Answered requests for review and their responses are made public.
Reviews of the IAD's actions will be considered at his or her following
performance review.  Reviews of the IAOC's actions may be considered
when IAOC members are subsequently being seated.



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]