RE: iasa-bcp-04: unanimity in section 3.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On Monday, January 17, 2005 9:06 AM -0500 Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bert sez:
NEW:
                <t>
                    The IAOC attempts to reach consensus on
all decisions.                     If the IAOC cannot achieve
a consensus decision, then                     the IAOC
decides by voting.
                </t>


I thought the other point was that the text should read "If the IAOC cannot achieve a consensus decision, then the IAOC can decide by voting"

i. not mandate voting - leave it up to them

Yes, that was the intent. We should never mandate the IAOC to vote; they should have the opportunity and obligation to decide to do that. And I don't think we should try to specify that decision mechanism in the BCP.


     john



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]