In message <7171.1105829321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Michael Richards on" writes: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >Is there a document that explains how 169.254/16 is used? >And if so, how come RFC3330 does not reference it? > draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt, currently in the RFC editor's queue. That, of course, explains why 3330 doesn't have the citation -- it's not an RFC. (Arguably, 3330 should have cited the I-D.) --Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf