Re: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



harald proposes:
  3.5 Decision review

   In the case where someone questions a decision of the IAD or the
   IAOC, he or she may ask for a formal review of the decision.

   The request for review is addressed to the person or body that made
   the decision. It is up to that body to decide to make a response,
   and on the form of a response.

   The IAD is required to respond to requests for a review from the
   IAOC, and the IAOC is required to respond to requests for a review
   of a decision from the IAB or from the IESG.

   If members of the community feel that they are unjustly denied a
   response to a request for review, they may ask the IAB or the IESG
   to make the request on their behalf.

   Answered requests for review and their responses are made public.

I am still worried about the possibility of a DoS attack and the messy
situation where the looser in a bid wants the bid award overturned so
would be happier with some language that says that its real hard
or impossible to overturn signed contracts 

but that said I can live with what Harald suggests if no one else
shares my worries

Scott

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]