Re: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:00:41 +0200
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <DDB872AE53293335F14963C3@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
Organization: None
Reply-to: jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

Does this seem like a reasonable point on the various scales of concern?


I think so.

--Jari

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus? #733 Outsourcing principle
Next by Date: Re: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions
Previous by thread: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions
Next by thread: Re: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]