Good plan! Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > Harald Tveit Alvestrand > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:07 > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Timeline for further work on IASA BCP > > > At the moment, there are 19 open tickets in the issue > tracker. Some of > these are overlapping. > > Of these, I think only issue #740 has been raised by people > who speak for > ISOC; I am not sure whether it means that ISOC is otherwise > OK with the > text or that ISOC has not sent comments yet. > > Lynn Duval (ISOC) has reviewed the document from a financial > perspective, > and sent comments. The editors have scheduled a meeting with > her next week > to check the current wording. > Jorge Contreras (the IETF lawyer) is reviewing the document > from a legal > perspective. More review is, of course, welcome! > > My current plan for this week is: > > - Today: Attempt to send "Consensus?" messages on the > remaining 19 issues, > if I think that's possible > > - Friday morning, US-ET: Submit a revised draft (-04) to the > internet-drafts editor. > > - Friday afternoon, once I-D is published: Send out a note on > this list > asking 2 questions: > - Is the draft now good enough? > - Do we need to reissue, lengthen or restart the Last Call? > > The next two steps are contingent on a "no" answer on the > last question: > > - Thursday, Jan 20: Put the document before the IESG for IESG > review and > possible approval. If the discussion indicates that IETF > community members > require more time for review, I will place a DISCUSS vote on > the document > that will remain in force until I conclude that the community > says that it > has had enough time to review. I think it unlikely that it > can be passed on > this date, but it is good to have the formal IESG review done. > > - The next IESG telechat is on Thursday, Feb 3. Given that > the document is > discussed at one IESG telechat, it is possible to have it > approved between > telechats, if community consensus indicates that this is the > Right Thing. > Otherwise, we discuss it again here. > > Seems like a plan? > > Harald > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf