Re: Confused about references to I-D when the RFC is published

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Sunday, 09 January, 2005 22:22 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer
<bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Last week, one RFC has been published with a reference to an
> I-D when the final RFC is already published.
> 
> RFC 3958 says:
> 
>    [11] Atkins, D. and R. Austein, "Threat Analysis Of The
> Domain Name         System", Work in Progress, April 2004.
> 
> while RFC 3833 is five months old.
> 
> Now, I understand that RFC 3958 was probably approved before
> RFC 3833 was issued. But I thought
> (ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/rfc-editor-proce
> ss.gif) that references were supposed to be updated by the RFC
> editor even after approval by the IESG?

Yes.  But this is also the sort of thing that authors are
supposed to check carefully on RFC Editor 48 hour author's last
call.  Slip-ups happen; no one is perfect.

    john


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]