Re: Consensus? #770 Compensation for IAOC members

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think this line of thought has died down without any great
> disagreement.... the consensus seems to be that the following sentence:
>
>   The IAOC members shall not receive any compensation (apart from
>   exceptional reimbursement of expenses) for their services as
>   members of the IAOC.
>
> belongs in the document. I think that placing it at the end of 4.0
> makes for the most reasonable placement (together with all the stuff
> about membership selection).
>
> (Personally, I'm not fond of the word "exceptional". It begs the
> question of who grants exceptions, and what the criteria for
> exceptions are. But the debaters seem to favour it.
> I'd rather say "possible", and add "IAOC sets and publishes rules for
> reimbursement of expenses, if that ever becomes necessary". But I can
> live with the current text).

I prefer your wording as well.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]