On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:08:05PM +0000, Michael Everson wrote: > At 16:56 +0100 2005-01-06, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > >I would also favour the country code as second field, as it would be > >backwards compatible with RFC 3066, and also compatible with the order > >used in locales. > > That would be an example of getting these tags to > do more than identify varieties of language. It was not the intention to use the RFC 3066 bis tags as locale identifiers. I only listed the concern as to not confuse the public at large with different rules for similar concepts. Best regards Keld _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf