accounting transparency is mentioned in a number of places already it seems overly redundent to mention it here yet again - but its not a big deal to me Scott ----- Kurtis comments on text suggested by Bernard: > On 2004-12-09, at 17.02, Bernard Aboba wrote: > > > Suggest this be rewritten to: > > > > "The IAOC is accountable for the structure of the IASA and thus decides > > which functions are to be outsourced. All outsourcing must be via > > well-defined contracts or equivalent instruments. Both outsourced and > > in-house functions must be clearly specified and documented with > > well-defined deliverables, service level agreements, and transparent > > accounting for the cost of such functions." > > I think this is overkill. It is up to the IAD/IAOC to decide how to > account for costs of outsourced contracts, so I would put a period > after "service level agreements". > I have seen support for Bernard's statement (on email I believe by Margaret) and I like Bernard's text myself as well. I have not seen anyone agree with Kurtis yet. So for now I am believing we seem to have more agreement on the complete text suggested by Bernard. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf