ah, back to openness issues. i was wondering when we would get back
here.
i am fine with this one.
a.
On 22 dec 2004, at 08.20, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
(note - there are several tickets on openness in general. I am trying
to close off this one, because it seems to have been debated
"enough"....)
Margaret said:
Should the same web site also include a record of all written/legal
correspondence received by or sent by the IAOC (with sections removed
if absolutely necessary for confidentiality)?
A long thread resulted (see tracker), in which Leslie quoted from the
document:
Transparency: The IETF community shall have complete visibility into
the financial
and legal structure of the ISOC standards activity. In particular, a
detailed budget for the entire standards activity, quarterly financial
reports, and audited annual financial reports shall all be available
to
the IETF community. In addition, key contract material and MOUs shall
also be publicly available. The IAD and IAOC are responsible for
providing regular overviews of the state of the IASA to the IETF
community.
I think that the consensus on the thread was that the particular
requirement being proposed was not warranted; I therefore suggest that
we close this ticket with no change to the document.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf