Re: Consensus? #746 Section 3.4 - IAOC decision making

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Harald points out
> this is not what your previous emails said, which is one reason why I did 
> not want to accept them - there you talked about the "whole IAOC being 
> involved", which was different from "4 of the IAOC being in favour".

I gave that up a long time ago when there was no support

> I think attempting to work all these corner cases out in the BCP is not a 
> Good Thing.

I do not think that quorum is a "corner case" but it looks like this
is a case where "rough consensus" does not include me

Scott

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]