RE: Consensus? Minor issue #730: Section 2.2 - Authority over st andards development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:49
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Consensus? Minor issue #730: Section 2.2 - Authority over
> standards development
> 
> 
> Old text:
> 
> >> 2. The IAD, IAOC and ISOC shall not have any authority over the IETF
> >> standards development activities.
> 
> Issue: ISOC already has a role in IETF standards development 
> activities.
> 
> Suggested new text:
> 
> > 2. The IAD and IAC shall not have any authority over the IETF
> > standards development activities, and this document does not
> > confer any new authority or responsibilities to ISOC regarding
> > IETF standards development.
> 
> Resolution:
> 
> Slight modification of the suggested text:
> 
> 2. The IAD and IAOC shall not have any authority over the IETF
> standards development activities. This document does not
> modify ISOC's other roles related to the IETF standars process.
> 
> (Reason: This doc neither expands nor contracts the existing 
> responsbilities)
> 
> OK?
> 
fine. And I will fix s/standars/standards/

Bert
>                Harald
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]