> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:22:53 -0800 > From: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Fw: New Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP > To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, <ietf-languages@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: blilly@xxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <23f901c4df28$53e048b0$6501a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > I am somewhat sympathetic to the idea of having some > total limit (except for the late date for the proposed change). Earlier feedback would have been had if there had been some announcement of the proposed considerable changes on the ietf-822 mailing list, or via an IETF WG charter. > However, we > got considerable pushback on having RFC 3066bis make any previously valid > RFC3066 tag be invalid Entirely appropriate. And the proposed draft would invalidate the meaning of the valid RFC 3066 language tag "sr-CS", which is currently in use. > and any length restriction would do that. If it makes you happy, you can exclude private-use tags from an explicit limit. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf