> Date: 2004-12-14 16:01 > From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: ietf-languages@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > The "grandfathered" production in the RFC 3066bis ABNF is intended only > for the 24 entries (not 46, as I wrote earlier) that are carried over > from the RFC 3066 registry and that don't otherwise conform to the RFC > 3066bis syntax. ÂTake a look at the items marked "grandfathered" in the > proposed registry: > > http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/lstreg.html > > If you can write a reasonable "grandfathered" production in ABNF that > will allow this set of tags and no others, such that the ABNF can be > used without also referring to the prose, then I salute you. If there really are only 24 items of less than 11 octets each, a trivial solution is to simply list them (with the usual ABNF syntax) as literal strings. That should take no more than a half-dozen lines. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf