John C Klensin wrote:
Then these need the "bad" designation, not just the "not really
interesting any more" one. And that, presumably, requires a
"1828/1829 considered harmful" document, or at least a paragraph
and a place to put it.
Well, gosh and golly gee, I wrote an "ISAKMP considered harmful" about 6 years ago, and the IESG -- for the first time in its history -- ordered it removed from the internet-drafts repository (saying the IETF wouldn't publish anything critical of the IETF process).
It was published as a Usenix ";login:" feature article instead....
I suspect Bob and I could have something in days!
-- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf