Eliot Lear writes: > I'll remove it from the list with the expectation that the new MIB > will obsolete the old one. However, I note that is currently not > stated in the header of the draft. I think RFC1269 (BGP-3 MIB) can safely be dropped even today, because nobody is using BGP-3 anymore, and as Bert pointed out, we already have RFC1657 (BGP-4 MIB). RFC1657 is what people use today. By the way, draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib-15.txt is a relatively minor update to RFC 1657, and misses many "recent" additions to BGP-4 that are widely used, such as support for multiple address families etc. There was an attempt at writing a modernized BGP-4 MIB, but that seems to have stalled (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-05.txt is a tombstone). Did I mention that writing MIBs is harder than it should be? -- Simon. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf