Re: List of Old Standards to be retired

[Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx>]

The way we've been running the experiment, if there is a portion of the 
doc that is still useful then we leave it alone but recommend an update. 
 In other words no status change until someone takes further action. 
Having said that, I will remove RFC 1618 from the list, but it would be 
great if you did the update and in the process then obsoleted RFC 1618.

Eliot


Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Dec 16 2004, at 12:46 Uhr, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> > RFC1618       PPP over ISDN
>
>
> We had a short discussion about this in pppext.
>
> The gist was: The document is pretty bad (partly because things were 
> murky in 1994, but also because it was written by Martians that had no 
> space ship to take them to the ISDN planet), but some parts of it do 
> describe what currently shipping, actively marketed products do (and 
> should do) in this domain.
> Having done some ISDN work in the late 80s/early 90s, I all but 
> volunteered during this discussion to do a DS version of the thing 
> (probably by striking 80 % of the text and rewriting the rest).
> If this is what it takes to keep an active standards-track specification 
> about IP over ISDN, I'll do that tiny amount of work.
> Or we could leave it where it is.
>
> Gruesse, Carsten
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf