RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Geoff Huston <gih@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
From: Fred Baker <fred@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:21:54 -0800
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.0.1.1.2.20041214150033.0239ae90@localhost>
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx

At 03:06 PM 12/14/04 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:

I believe we strongly agree here.

Outstanding!

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
  - From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
  - From: Pete Resnick
- RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
  - From: Fred Baker
- RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
  - From: Geoff Huston
- RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
  - From: Fred Baker
- RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
  - From: Geoff Huston

Prev by Date: RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
Next by Date: Re: BCP-02: Financial statements and Audits
Previous by thread: RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
Next by thread: RE: Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]