I've gone various ways on this, but I think that imposing a duty of regular payment on ISOC is appropriate - so that paying the IETF late doesn't become a tempting cash-flow management tool. I would be happy with a phrasing that asks for at least 3 payments per year.
Brian
Brian,
what can we pay late? We have to pay salaries, RFC Editor, meeting contracts, outsourcing contracts, insurance, etc. on time. This makes it sound like a deposit model rather than paying for expenses?
Lynn
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf