Oh, in that case, I echo your concern...
We should have had a proposed final document in front of us before the IETF LC was started.
Margaret
At 7:46 AM -0500 12/11/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
Margaret sez:I took this part:
>>> After all this threading, it seems clear that it would be bad >>> to send out the Last Call today as planned without settling >>> this issue.
To mean that Harald is _not_ starting the IETF Last Call as scheduled.
the message in question was sent to the IETF Announce list (not the IETF list) with the subject line
"Last Call: 'Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA)' to BCP"
and included the text: "Therefore, I am issuing this Last Call while discussion is ongoing."
The ID tracker lists the document as being in state "In Last Call"
sure looks like an IETF Last Call to me
(& I agree with John's concern)
Scott
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf