Re: iasa-bcp-01 - Open Issues - Separate bank accounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:


--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 10:23:33 -0500 Margaret Wasserman <margaret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


This is OK, but if I was still on the ISOC Board I might have some
questions about the last sentence. s/expect/hope/ perhaps.


This makes sense, particularly in light of my belief that the IETF should
ask ISOC for its support, not presume it.


I actually think the whole thread is very much congruent to what's specified in section 5 of iasa-bcp-02. Can the debaters please check that, and see if we still want more changes?

Remember - section 2.2 is (short) principles, section 5 is the (longer) description of how we plan to implement them; both are part of the BCP that we want to be committed to and change VERY rarely.

This is a matter of principle I think - so I do see value in an explicit sentence in 2.2.

   Brian




_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]