But in that case I do have a problem with making the barrier higher for appeals originating from a non IOAC member. While I can see arguments for not removing an IAOC's member's right of appeal, I don't see any arguments that should give them any greater right of appeal. I.e. I would have difficulty supporting a mechanism that weighed 1 IAOC member versus 10 non members as suggested in your original message.
Allow appeals to be made but set some bar for an appeal; perhaps appeals from IAOC members are always accepted, but appeals from the community require say 10 signatures.
a.
On 3 dec 2004, at 22.44, Sam Hartman wrote:
"avri" == avri <avri@xxxxxxx> writes:
avri> And I don't think we want to get into a situation where we avri> have one member of the IAOC appealing the actions of the avri> IAOC.
I do. Or rather in cases where that happens, I'd treat the appeal very seriously. Being reasonable is one of the criteria we use for selecting our leadership. If that leadership still feels a decision is worth appealing even knowing the consequences and pain of such an appeal, then I'm very interested in what they have to say.
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf