> I agree. The redudancy should stay... It is just a single sentence, > and it could save us from later misunderstandings that would be > incredibly difficult to unravel. I do not see how it makes anything clearer to say "only appointed members" then to go on to point out that non-appointed members are not OK the redundant text is not needed by definition because its redundant but, along the same line, it does not hurt to include it because it is redundant so, since some people seem to fear that people could be confused leave it Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf