> Stephen Sprunk wrote: > Clearly, if IPv6 PI space spirals out of control like many > operators think will happen, we need to find a way to make > BGP (and possibly forwarding) performance not dependent on > the number of prefixes in the table. I agree 100%, but this is easier said than done: if we had a silver bullet it would have shown up already; the main issue with the routing table appears to be stability (not memory) to me. If vendors had found the magic potion to handle million prefixes it would be a heck of a good sales pitch in order to get us to buy one more time brand stinking new gear. > and maybe it's time we start looking at that in parallel > to the work on multi6 and HIP. Realistically it would take more than 10 years to get anything done in this domain. Replacing BGP might not be as hard as replacing IP, but it is a formidable task nevertheless. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf