RE: Adminrest: section 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personal opinion.

Would it not be nice if ISOC could sort of designate a yearly
amount to go to IETF instead of having to just cough up whatever
budget gap we seem to have?

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> sob@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 05:23
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Adminrest: section 5
> 
> 
> 
> section 5 starts out saying 
>    The IASA manages money from three sources:
>    
>    1.  IETF meeting revenues.
>    
>    2.  Designated donations to ISOC (both monetary and in-kind).
>    
>    3.  Other ISOC support.
> 
> then goes on to say
>    Note that the goal is to achieve and maintain a viable IETF support
>    function based on meeting fees and designated donations.
> 
> I see no reason whatsoever to eliminate the other ISOC support 
> from the second text - what benefit can flow from limiting the
> way that the ISOC raises IETF support? - the first part of 
> section 5 is
> fine - do not negate the flexability in the second part
> 
> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]