> > At 3:41 PM +0100 12/1/04, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >Yes, I've always assumed there will be an MOU between IETF and ISOC, > >both to recognize the BCP when we have it, and to make explicit some > >of these boundary conditions. > > This is interesting, because I had not assumed that there would be a > separate MOU... > > Who do you think would negotiate the MOU on behalf of the IETF? And > who would sign it? > I must admit, I share Margaret's reaction. I assumed the BCP was the governing document and wouldn't necessarily have to be supplemented with a codified set of supplements and interpretations. :) Carl _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf