Re: Why people by NATs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 01:44:30PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 12:17 +0000, Tim Chown wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > 
> > > Depends on the type of home user ;)
> > > Nevertheless, most homes currently only consist of maybe 3 ethernet
> > > segments (wired, wireless, office or something) and maybe a max of 20
> > > hosts. Changing the IP's of those hosts should not be a problem even if
> > > you had to do it manually. Most of these NAT boxes come with built-in
> > > DHCP support, hopefully the will come with IPv6 and RA and maybe DHCPv6
> > > support too in the near future (Yamaha has them already :)
> > 
> > Or you just modify a Linksys router :)
> 
> Ack, nicely turn that NAT box into a real router by flashing it with a 
> This is unfortunately not something that most people dare to do. Then
> again, I know that quite a lot of people 'upgraded' their SpeedTouch
> Home's to Pro's for somewhat the same purpose. And for that matter a lot
> of people upgrade their Xboxes, PS2's etc. There is always somebody who
> can do this around.

I didn't say that your mother could do this, but given that some amateurs
have already modified the Linksys to do v6 then it would not be difficult
for Cisco/Linksys to do so in a short timeframe, if they chose to.

As for NAT, then v4+NAT dual-stack IPv6 will be very common.

-- 
Tim

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]