RE: Why people by NATs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: RE: Why people by NATs

 

Hi Tony,

Your enclosed feature comparison list is a fine list.   However, the sooner the residential gateway feature set is expanded to cover support of  tunneling  IPv6 running on top IPv4 as a bearer, the faster you will see IPv6 deployed.   Why build in a dependancy on the carriers moving to IPv6 when you don't have to.

Here is the SAT test question related to IPv6 transition:

Q: IPv6 is to IPv4 as

a) IPv4 to X.25

b) IPv4 to ISDN

c) IPv4 to ATM

d) all of the above

 

regards, peterf

 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]