RE: Why people by NATs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric,

I suspent that none of us on this list qualify as the nominal consumer.

I do vehemently agree with your last paragraph.  In some sense, you are
saying that NAT is an intrinsic part of the nominal "residential
gateway" (could be expanded for soho and small/medium business).  As
such, what is the nominal IPv6 based "residential gateway", and its
feature set?

Perhaps the IETF needs to do for "residential gateways" what it did for
routers in the old router requirements days.

Regards, peterf




_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]