Scott, > I think that my main point was not clear enough - the current > wording implies that ISOC folk (accountant, President/CEO, lawyer, > etc - but not BoT) are not permitted be part of the RFP response review > process and are not primitted to warn the IAD and IAOC that the contractor > they want to sign up has a bad track record or that the proposed > contract itself has a significant legal flaw - this seems basically > broken to me Just a reminder that the current BCP draft has the ISOC President/CEO as a voting member of the IAOC, so it seems unlikely that this officer is excluded from the RFP response review process. As to the accountant and lawyer (I'd look out for too many etcetera's :) - again, considering that the IAOC is intended to be part of ISOC, I wonder in what model the audit and legal reviews that are part of the RFP response reviews will not be ISOC audit and legal reviews, using ISOC accountant/lawyer? Allison _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf