Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Fred,

 

"Orthogonal" isn't one of the options ... perhaps we should add it in NEWTRK?

 

RFC 3819 is BCP guidance for layer two protocol designers who want clue. The other PILC BCPs (3150 and 3155) are guidance for transport users who have to run over layer two protocols designed without clue. Similar environments, but different readers.

 

And thanks for asking!

 

Spencer

----- Original Message -----

From: Fred Templin

To: Spencer Dawkins ; ietf@xxxxxxxx

Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 12:11 PM

Subject: Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed

Spencer Dawkins <spencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3819.txt was published in July
(blush!)... (snip) ... and it is a BCP ...

 

How does this work relate to RFC3150 (BCP48) and RFC3155 (BCP50),

e.g., I don't see any "Obsoletes:" statements in the header?

 

Thanks - Fred

osprey67@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf