-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-11-08, at 21.55, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi Harald, Marcia, > > I'm not sure what is the problem, but as you probably know, we still > don't > have IPv6 in the IETF61 network, which is really bad. > > The worst thing is not getting anyone from the host or whoever is the > responsible, reading the numerous emails about this in this list and > providing at least a reply. Something like "we are working on it", at > least, > will be nice. > > In case they are not reading the list, I guess you know who is the > ultimate > responsible, and can forward him this email. > > Somebody already suggested that if they need some help, is available, > but if > they say nothing, of course, nobody will be able to help. > > Hopefully this is not a situation that last until the end of the week > and > hopefully we make sure next time that actually it doesn't happen even > since > IETF meeting day -1. I want to disagree with Jordi. I want want working IPv4 first. IPv4 seems to be coming and going during the day. This is during the mboned session tonight 11 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 27% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 113.621/129.023/170.027 ms 8 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 25% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 136.386/156.679/208.79 ms I thought it was my Wlan card first but I hear others with problems as well. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQY/sgqarNKXTPFCVEQJ79wCeLAciy58v8mXMQWmH4wsf9V9QNZMAoJYS 2o1n4D77gmGMSjC/CUANkAe/ =khs2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf