Re: Disfranchise - use of language [Was: Re: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at the lastmoment]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 01:23:19PM -0700, Stephane Maes allegedly wrote:
> Carsten,
> 
> You may be confusing my concern. It is not an issue of voting or having no voice in reaching consensus. It is an issue that if people who intended or needed to participate FTF are prevented to do so by late schedule changes, they are disfranchised from the discussion process (if they believe that the FTF was the best venue to discuss issues, input, whatever matter to them. That is the problem and anybody who allows that to happen indeed fails to cater to this fundamental issue. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Stephane

Late schedule changes did not prevent you from participating.  You are
not a victim.  Your lack of knowledge of, and assumptions about, the
IETF's scheduling process led you to make a mistake in your scheduling.
Now you know, and you won't make the mistake again.  However, you can't
blame the IETF, which very clearly marked non-final versions of the
agenda "DRAFT".  Are we done yet?

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]