Disfranchise - use of language [Was: Re: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at the lastmoment]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gruessdi Carsten,

Let's not pick up on each others use of language shall we?
Disfrachise is a perfectly good word. I believe it means exactly what Stephane intended it
to mean...

"To deprive of a franchise or chartered right; to dispossess of the rights of a citizen,
or of a particular privilege, as of voting, holding office, etc."

Better to stick to a debate of the point at hand.

Adrian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carsten Bormann" <cabo@xxxxxxx>
To: "Stephane H. Maes" <stephane.maes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Carsten Bormann" <cabo@xxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at the lastmoment


> On Nov 06 2004, at 21:27 Uhr, Stephane H. Maes wrote:
>
> > disfranchised
>
> If you really have to continue your crusade on the IETF list, can you
> at least stop using this word (assuming you mean disenfranchised)?
> There is no voting in the IETF, so you can't be deprived of any voting
> right.
>
> Gruesse, Carsten
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]