Reviewer: Rich Salz Review result: Has Nits I am the assigned SECDIR reviewer for this draft. I know almost nothing about CoAP, but I have been one of the DE's for the TLS registries for a few years. I have some concerns, but they are mostly editorial. I was confused by Section 3. At first I thought it was real examples of erroneous registrations, but it is rather samples of things that this draft would no prevent. Perhaps the introduction and/or title can be made more clear. In Section 4.1, I find two registration procedures depending on the contents to be rather unusual. It seems simpler to make everything expert review. But if this is WG consensus, that's okay. Sec 4.2 Defines a new early allocation procedure. Requests can be made by draft authors. Are you sure that you want authors to be able to request early allocation, rather than the WG chairs? Should it at least be clarified that only authors of WG-adopted drafts? Sec 4.4 should clarify state explicitly if there is one DE, or multiple and what the quorum is. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
