Looking at the draft, the simplest "fix" would be to say "new protocols
using TCP" in all the places that currently say "new protocols". (I
think that this would have the minor benefit of removing the last
sentence of the abstract and introduction.)
Another approach would be to add a very short definitions section that
says "For purposes of this document 'new protocol' means newly developed
work that rides on TCP." That leaves the abstract still slightly vague,
but I can live with that.
Yours,
Joel
On 3/3/2025 12:40 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
Can we
refine the "new protocols" term somehow to be more specific?
At least one of the off-list discussion Joel mentions was between him and me (primary draft author).
If anyone can come up with a good definition to limit "new protocols" I would be glad to incorporate it.
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
