Hi Mahesh,
At 12:30 PM 25-02-2025, John C Klensin wrote:
(from the Abstract of draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-10 if that makes
any difference)
The (publicly) information available for the "discuss" on that draft
was: "Thanks for addressing the DISCUSS and COMMENT". There would be
more information available if the draft went through a working group
as IESG discusses are copied to the working group mailing list. I
assume that was because of a 2007 comment from Adrian.
Could the DISCUSSes and follow-up for AD-sponsored I-Ds be copied to
the relevant Area mailing list or some other mailing list?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
