On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 3:20 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/15/25 4:26 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> Makes sense. But that implies a container format that PRECIS did not
> mention either.
How so? Perhaps you could provide a definition of container format,
beacuse it's not clear to me why the PRECIS specs would have needed to
specify container formats.
They don't need to. The point is that PRECIS is vague (slotted where?) from one direction, and this draft is also similarly vague.
> Giving the unichars draft a hard time on this point seems a bit harsh.
Traditionally in standards development,
Mmm, I've been around the block. I phrased it that way on purpose.
trying to clarify requirements
is not seen as "harsh" but as part of our job. I offered my previous
message in the spirit of collaboratively getting clear on things.
I'd be happy if all of the PRECIS text was deleted from this draft, but I don't object to it. I don't see this document causing harm. Worst case, it will be ignored.
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
