[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-bray-unichars-10.txt> (Unicode Character Repertoire Subsets) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/15/25 4:26 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:


On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 3:13 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 2/15/25 3:38 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
     > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 11:34 AM Peter Saint-Andre
    <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>
     > <mailto:stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
     >
     >     The PRECIS specifications, which
     >     followed the lead of the IDNA specifications in this regard, are
     >     primarily intended to apply to strings that go in protocol slots,
     >
     >
     > Where is "protocol slot" defined? I looked in the PRECIS
    documents, and
     > they do use the term, but I couldn't find a definition.

    We never formally defined the term. It is something like "a place
    allotted by a protocol specification for communication or exchange of
    addresses, identifiers, and other constructs critical to interoperation
    between entities in a protocol."


Makes sense. But that implies a container format that PRECIS did not mention either.

How so? Perhaps you could provide a definition of container format, beacuse it's not clear to me why the PRECIS specs would have needed to specify container formats.

Giving the unichars draft a hard time on this point seems a bit harsh.

Traditionally in standards development, trying to clarify requirements is not seen as "harsh" but as part of our job. I offered my previous message in the spirit of collaboratively getting clear on things.

Peter

--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux